C. IC50s of SCH722984 only or in combination with MK-2206 or MK-8669. After 120?hours treatment with 0C10?M SCH722984, SCH722984+ MK-2206 or SCH722984+ MK-8669, cell viability was determined by bioluminescence assay. Results are representative data in duplicate from three self-employed experiments (n =?6). B. Percent growth inhibition for two BRAF-mutant melanoma cell lines (M233 and M411) and two NRAS-mutant UAMC-3203 hydrochloride cell lines (M409 and WM1366). After 120?hours treatment with 0C10?M SCH772984?+?MK2206 (ERKi?+?AKTi, squares), SCH722984?+?MK-8669 (ERKi?+?mTORi, triangles), or the SCH772984 (ERKi, circles), cell viability was determined by bioluminescence assay. Results are representative data in duplicate from three self-employed experiments (n =?6). C. Effect ERK- inhibition only or the combination with AKT/mTOR inhibitors on MAPK signaling. Cell lines were treated with DMSO (control, C), 1 uM SCH722984 (ERKi, E) or the combination of SCH722984+ MK-2206 and SCH722984+ MK-8669 at 1 uM for 24?hours. Western blots analyzed for phospho- and total ERK1/2, AKT and actin as loading control. RGS17 (PDF 78 KB) 12943_2014_1396_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (78K) GUID:?859DD7AA-87F9-44F1-AC8B-CFA5EC91AC2E Additional file 4: Figure S4: Effect of trametinib about NRAS mutant and double crazy type cell lines. IC50 (nM). 14 NRAS mutant and 7 double wild-type melanoma cell lines were exposed to 0-1?M trametinib and cell viability was determined by ATP-based bioluminescence assay (CellTiter-Glo, Promega). Results represent imply of duplicate assay performed in three self-employed experiments. (PDF 40 KB) 12943_2014_1396_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (40K) GUID:?DBBD4E22-FB1E-4962-A051-3153B7A3BC7B Additional file 5: Number S5: Combinatorial effect of Vemurafenib with SCH772984 or Trametinib. UAMC-3203 hydrochloride Percent growth inhibition of BRAF mutant cell lines. After 120?hours treatment with 0C10?M vemurafenib (squares) combined with 0-10 uM SCH722984 (circles), or 0C10?M vemurafenib combined with 0-1?M trametinib, cell viability was determined by bioluminescence assay. Results are representative data in duplicate from two self-employed experiments (n =?6). (PDF 348 KB) 12943_2014_1396_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (348K) GUID:?B83E8FAB-A0B9-448B-AF57-A19A61E47EBE Additional file 6: Figure S6: Effect of SCH722984, vemurafenib or the combination about cell cycle progression and apoptosis in BRAF-mutant melanoma cell lines. A UAMC-3203 hydrochloride sensitive cell collection (M263), intermediate level of sensitivity (M255) and resistant to SCH722984 (M370) were exposed to DMSO as vehicle control (ControL), 1?M vemurafenib (Vemurafenib), SCH722984 (ERKi), 50nM trametinib (Trametinib), the combination of 1?M vemurafenib?+?1?M SCH722984 (V?+?E) or the combination of 1Mvemurafenib?+?50nM trametinib (V?+?T) for 48?hours. A. Cell cycle progression example for M255 was tested by DAPI staining remedy and induced apoptosis by cleaved PARP (PARP-Ax700). B. Apoptosis in response to MAPK inhibitors. Percentage of apoptotic cells positive for cleaved PARP (PARP-Ax700) with this three melanoma cell lines. B. Quantitative analysis of the cell cycle progression by DAPI staining UAMC-3203 hydrochloride using circulation cytometry shows the percentage of cells in sub-G0, G0/G1, S phase, or G2/M. (PDF 199 KB) 12943_2014_1396_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (199K) GUID:?83A92EAD-F181-4F3D-87E7-833B48D2BEA4 Abstract Background In melanoma, dysregulation of the MAPK pathway, usually via or somatic mutations, prospects to constitutive ERK signaling. While BRAF inhibitors are in the beginning effective for mutant, or wild-type melanoma. Methods The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of SCH772984, a novel inhibitor of ERK1/2, was identified in a panel of 50 melanoma cell lines. Effects on MAPK and AKT signaling by western blotting and cell cycle by circulation cytometry were UAMC-3203 hydrochloride identified. Results Sensitivity fell into three organizations: sensitive, 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) ?1?M; intermediately sensitive, IC50 1-2?M; and resistant, 2?M. Fifteen of 21 (71%) mutants, including 4 with innate vemurafenib resistance, were sensitive to SCH772984. All three (100%) double mutants, 11 of 14 (78%) mutants and 5 of 7 (71%) wild-type melanomas were sensitive. Among mutants with acquired resistance to vemurafenib, those with MAPK pathway reactivation as the mechanism of resistance were sensitive to SCH772984. SCH772984 caused G1 arrest and induced apoptosis. Conclusions Combining vemurafenib and SCH722984 in BRAF mutant melanoma was synergistic in a majority of cell lines and significantly delayed the onset of acquired resistance in long term assays. Therefore, SCH772984 may be clinically relevant as a treatment for non-mutant melanoma or in mutational status. Approximately 50% of all melanomas contain an activating wild-type melanoma, including melanoma. Indeed, treatment of non-BRAF mutant cells with dabrafenib or vemurafenib would result in paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway, mediated by CRAF [4, 5]. For mutant melanoma, initial response rate to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) is definitely beyond 50%, though median period of response is only 6-7 months. Resistance to BRAFi has been.